Instagram Insanity: Lessons Learned from a Brand in Crisis

Heather Sliwinski Leave a comment

This week, Instagram started a digital fury with a blog post that described a soon-to-be implemented privacy change. The addition to the current terms of use policy was, “You agree that a business may pay Instagram to display your photos in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions without any compensation to you.” The outcry came from users thinking that Instagram intended to sell their photos without permission or paying them for their use.

This change became the center of a heightened digital panic and “jump ship” mentality of a lot of their users. This immediate blowback seems to be directly tied to Instagram potentially presuming its users fully understood the pre-existing policy.

According to a blog post by Nilay Patel, “First, like every other company on the web that stores user data, Instagram has always had an expansive license to use and copy your photos. It has to — that’s how it runs its networks of servers around the world.” The public didn’t understand the terms of use policies as they relate to the services and how they apply to their data when using the service, evidenced by the explosive mass hysteria and digital backlash from users.

While the blog post was written with the good intent to provide users with knowledge of a changing policy, Instagram’s blog not only allowed users to see the change in policy, but brought the original policy to the attention of many users. They seemed to be reading the actual policy after reading the blog, versus when they first subscribed to the free service. They were concerned with its entire composition, not just the composition of the added sentence.

If Instagram understood this long-known truth about its users, they could have been much more forthcoming and avoided this crisis. Instagram did respond with a positive blog post to show they were listening and aiming to please their users. In an age of increased social responsibility, it was wise for Instagram to be reactive in support of their policies while being supportive of their users.

However, Instagram could have avoided this crisis simply by using language that’s easier to understand and being much more transparent with their message describing the policy, the changes being made and how it would affect users.

Most users understand that businesses like Instagram have to start generating money, and in the online world, that involves monetizing user data. If Instagram incorporated or engaged their users more in this process, it could have averted this crisis, and people would understand this need. People aren’t afraid to pay for the things they like, such as how Netflix maintained their membership throughout their price divisions, when they listened and engaged their users and made changes to their proposed price changes to fit the needs of their goals and their users. However, the same consumers who are not afraid to pay are however resistant to clouded change and uninvolved decisions.

As a result of the quick action and response by Instagram, they released a statement denying reports that say about 25 percent of their total daily active users were lost. The company plans to go forward, to take the time to complete their plans and then come back to users and explain how they would like advertising to work. However, the public uproar could have been prevented had Instagram taken a more proactive approach.

The biggest lesson for communicators and practitioners is that transparency rules. In this digital world, where free digital startups begin and explode, the transition that will come allowing these companies to earn will need to involve their users and their supporters instead of only burning up venture capitalist money or changing terms to earn through data but lose trust from users.

Vanessa Barnett, technology and media lawyer at Charles Russell LLP, said, “There’s no free lunch on the Internet, and the modern currency is not pounds, shillings and pence but personal data. What matters, and what the law says, is that if you collect and use personal data, you need to be transparent about it.  As long as we have transparency, we also have free will.”

 

JR RochesterJR Rochester is a digital copywriter for Lowe’s Home Improvement and a recent graduate of East Carolina University with a degree in public relations and interpersonal organizational communication. He has experience in social media, community building digitally and locally, in-depth experience planning, implementing digital product marketing strategies, grass roots efforts, client and brand reputation management, event planning and marketing. He is a member of PRSA Charlotte, PRSA New Professionals Section and Toastmasters International. He is a proud veteran, drummer, avid cook and self-professed geek.

PRSA New Professionals Brown Bag: Get Your Dream Career

Heather Sliwinski Leave a comment

In our November New Professionals Section tweetchat, we discovered that many of our new professionals are eagerly searching for up-to-date relevant information on getting a job. Should you include social networks and a QR code on your resume? How can you bump up your interview strategy? We’re fortunate to have our very own part of PRSA dedicated to answering all of our questions – the PRSA Jobcenter.

In our upcoming Brown Bag, Richard Spector of PRSA Jobcenter, will share with us all of the basics, but also all of the new and creative ways to enhance your resume with QR codes and social media. Then, once you catch an employer’s attention with your resume, he’ll discuss how to “wow” them with your interview skills. In addition to interviews and resumes, he will review the job seeking tools PRSA has to offer.

Regardless of what stage of your career you’re in, this is always valuable information to have!

This New Pros Brown Bag will be held on Thursday, Jan. 17 from 12 to 1 p.m. EST. Remember, it’s free for New Pros members! Register here.

Richard Spector, manager of client services and sales support at PRSA, has been working with PRSA Jobcenter for five years. Spector guides public relations professionals of all levels in their job search, resume writing, networking and interview follow-up skills.

Intro to Crisis Communications

Heather Sliwinski Leave a comment

Almost 17 years ago, I started my career in public relations after a five-year stint as a trade journalist.  Since I have a social butterfly/people-person personality, I thought PR was all about mingling with the celebrities, traveling and promoting great news journalists were sure to write about.  After I took off my rose-colored glasses, I realized PR wasn’t always peaches and cream and often involved using skill sets like crisis communications to protect my company’s image and brand.

I started my career in technology PR and quickly discovered strategic crisis communications were must-have skills to survive in one of the most stressful jobs in the professional landscape. Why do you ask?  At most of the companies I worked for in the telecommunications segment in the 1990s, acquisitions, restructurings, layoffs and management upheavals were commonplace. Therefore, it was essential for me to develop crisis communications skills early on in my career to prepare my company for the worst.  Thinking on my feet, developing strategic counseling and planning skills were drilled into my DNA as a PR professional early on.

Fast forward to the last few years. What’s been the big trend in PR?  Whether you are a new PR or veteran PR professional, no one can forget the crises that have affected big companies like Chick-fil-A, BP, News Corp., Penn State, Netflix and HP. The common theme in many of these crises is that the PR and marketing teams didn’t develop solid communications plans to react to the media quickly enough and preserve their brand’s image.  Whether your company is in the technology, healthcare or travel and tourism field, you always need to be prepared for potential situations involving lawsuits, accusations of impropriety, sudden changes in management and other volatile situations on which your stakeholders — and the media that serves them — often focus.

Crisis communications is at the heart of my current job today.  My company provides essential information that helps customers across all industries and government predict, assess and manage risk. We provide products and services that address evolving client needs in the risk sector, while upholding the highest standards of security and privacy.  To that end, upholding my company’s standards of compliance in a highly-regulated industry is a natural extension of why crisis communications is so important.

For me, every day is different.  I have to stay on top of what’s happening with my company in the media landscape by reading and studying trends, including privacy and security changes, regulatory and compliance issues, to name a few.  In addition, I avidly monitor the news and potential crises through social media like Facebook, Twitter, Google+ and LinkedIn.  In a highly-regulated business like mine, it’s essential to respond appropriately to media inquiries as well.

One of the most enjoyable aspects of my job is helping our spokespeople and marketing teams develop strategic messages that help protect, preserve and raise our brand in key markets like financial services, government and insurance – ultimately so we can influence the key influencers – the media and analyst community.

Therefore, developing an issues or crisis communications playbook is the way our small communications team prepares for a potential crisis that could involve a technology issue, an executive appointment, a natural disaster or on-site employee issue.  This is our guide or instruction book for communicating quickly and decisivively to our key publics, including the media, the industry analysts, partners and customers, charities and investors.

Change continues to be the only constant in my job.  However, here are five for new professionals looking to add crisis communications skills into their careers:

  1. Take courses on crisis communications through PRSA and other outlets like PR News.  The only way to effectively learn how to become an effect crisis communications pro is by learning from the experts who have years of experience managing them the right way.
  2. Ask your key spokespeople what the five biggest risks would be to your organization’s business.  Asking the hard questions and preparing the answers to potential risks your organization faces, will help you prepare your talking points, Q&As and issues management playbook in the event a crisis happens.
  3. Study what has happened with some of the biggest PR crises over the last few years and learn from their mistakes.  Mistakes are bound to happen in the PR profession because communications aren’t always effectively managed or rolled out. But you can magnify those mistakes by a magnitude of 10 when a crisis is mishandled. So you can learn from what other companies or organizations have done to repair or resurrect their images and brands in the wake of disasters that will help you in the long run.
  4. Put your crisis communications skills into practice.  Start small by simulating a crisis communications drill.  Once your crisis playbook is developed, set up a war room and temporary phone lines and prepare your spokespeople to be trained to take questions from the media.  Practice makes perfect and drills help to make sure you are properly prepared if a true disaster happens.

Crisis communications is far and away one of the most difficult PR skill sets to master, but you need to learn to be prepared in case your company has to deal with a crisis.

 

Stephen LoudermilkStephen Loudermilk is global media and analyst relations director at LexisNexis, where he heads communications for the company’s Business Services and Screening practices.  In his spare time, he is actively involved in PRSA, where he serves as chairman of the Technology Section and treasurer of the PRSA Southeast District.

CSR: Why Organizations Can’t Ignore it Any Longer

Heather Sliwinski 4 Comments

Corporate social responsibility is not just a buzzword.

CSR is a function in which public relations professionals can and should take center stage. However, to bring an organization success in this area, it’s important to first understand why the industry’s emphasis on CSR will only continue to grow.

1. Millennials are changing the game.

As consumer segments go, the millennial generation (to which most of us new professionals belong) is both massive and powerful in the marketplace. As a whole, we are passionate and globally aware.

We care about things like sustainability and the environment. Driven by our “citizen of the world” ethos, we champion humanitarian causes and labor to give a voice to the powerless. We are activists and change agents. We oppose gimmicks, wince at blatant materialism and see through marketing fluff. We look past what a product will do for us and ask who made it, how they made it and how it worked its way through the supply chain and into our hands. We want the organizations we support to have a heart and a conscience.

What this means for brands and organizations is that CSR is not some theoretical “guiding principle” hung in a boardroom. These millennial values are actually forcing companies to revisit their business models and CSR assumptions, and the smartest organizations will let social responsibility revolutionize and dictate the way they do things.

2. Social media is ubiquitous – and it’s making everything else ubiquitous too.

With LinkedIn replacing rolodexes and Twitter affirming the 24-hour news cycle, social media has broken through boundaries that historically had been untouched. Facebook, Foursquare and other platforms have fully transformed society’s view of privacy. As a result, the public now expects to be intimately involved in everything from acquaintances’ personal affairs to the business decisions of companies they like.

In healthcare, the parties who fund research grants demand to see the medical discoveries and solutions made possible through their support. In nonprofits, donors want proof that their contributions are enabling good things, preventing bad things or making some sort of societal difference. In big business, investors need assurance that their company is acting ethically and will not become the next ENRON.

In the midst of all this, an organization must be able to represent itself honestly and openly, knowing that it can’t afford to withhold information – especially from the parties with whom it shares a symbiotic relationship. It must be conversational and flexible. The worst offense is to appear to be concealing something; you may as well put out a call for public scrutiny, assumptions and attacks. This greater call for transparency means that CSR must be fully integrated into an organization. It cannot merely be a morale program that a company decides to roll out. It has to be the organization’s lifeblood.

3. People respect consistency.

One striking thing about the recent presidential election was that so many citizens who couldn’t even articulate their views on political issues could tell you what they didn’t like about a candidate – and that was inconsistency. A common complaint about both major candidates was a lack of consistency and trust in their message.

It’s interesting to note how closely this aligns with the need for any organization to have discernible values and a consistent voice, from its investor meetings to its employee communications to its marketing. Consumers want to know what beliefs an organization upholds, and they want to know that the organization can be counted on to deliver on those values.

Companies can’t postpone CSR anymore—with greater demands for accountability and transparency, organizations need to find ways to make CSR an integral part of their overall mission.

Why do you think social responsibility is such a crucial function? How do you think PR supports an organization’s overall CSR strategy?

 

Keri CookKeri Cook works with Hill+Knowlton Strategies’ consumer marketing practice in New York. She graduated from Liberty University with a bachelor’s degree in communication studies and writes on topics ranging from media relations and marketing trends, to corporate strategy and crisis communications. While completing her undergrad, Cook was named PRWeek’s 2012 Student of the Year. She is also a member of the PRSA New Professionals Section.

Millennials vs. Boomers: the Imaginary Division

Heather Sliwinski Leave a comment

According to the National Center on Citizenship, there are 77 million baby boomers and 82 million millennials. Chances are you are among the wave of 82 million millennials who are now employed or are looking for employment, or are a member of the boomer era who is phasing out of the workplace. Our personal, professional, societal and structural values are changing and along with them, the workplace.

Unfortunately, the generations have been framed as feuding—one generation up against the other. Baby boomer vs. millennial.

Many stigmas are associated with both baby boomers and millennials to further this imaginary division. Millennials whine and feel entitled. They are lazy, immature, sloppy and in constant need of attention. Boomers are resistant to change, stuffy, impersonal, greedy and slow. These stereotypes come from one point of view misjudging the other. Boomers and millennials have much more in common than credit is given.

These differing values are ironically due to the boomers who have raised the millennials. An MTV study called “No Collar Workers” highlights the very different views that millennials and baby boomers have about professional life as a whole. This different mindset on how to approach the workplace seems to be the overwhelming variance between the two. Boomers and millennials differ on how the workplace should be run, where one fits into the overall structure, how teams are comprised, when and why meetings are scheduled and how to effectively collaborate on a team project, to name a few.

Boomers have values centered on structural and individual responsibility vs. collective responsibility. Boomers are hardworking, devoted to their position within the workplace and feel that the traditional office environment and the traditional workday is the best way to get the job done. “Face time” is equally important, as is the actual labor. Boomers prefer to have a specifically structured system where feedback is given at a specific time of year (six months review/annual review). This structure is based upon objectives and goals. Boomers are content with being a cog in a machine, not necessarily knowing or caring where they fit into the big picture. This expectancy and rigid hierarchy places each person in their “lane.” The hierarchy provides a chain of command that allows decisions and what work is to be done and by whom and what direction the company heads in delegated to appropriate areas.

Millennials would rather have no job than a job they hate. Millennials attach meaning to doing what they love not just doing. Millennials are hardworking and want to work where their creativity is appreciated and valued. Within the internal structure, millennials want to see where and how their work fits in the overall picture. Millennials crave mentorship and responses from their management and hierarchal team. Their view is a more flexible approach to the job. For millennials, as long as the work gets done, the amount of time spent in the office shouldn’t matter. Transparency is a mainstay of the millennials, which translates to openness and honesty.     

These stigmas, values and opinions about the other group cause both sects to get a bad rap. Boomers feel overworked and unappreciated, and millennials often feel the same way. Both sects face age discrimination and are having a tough time landing jobs in the current market. Boomers have been forced by financial necessity to delay retirement and continue working, while the millennials enter a more intense job market with fewer opportunities. Both groups need each other. They need each other for different reasons and are having a hard time understanding each other’s perspectives, values, motivations and intentions. Among the clash of ideological difference, personal difference and professional difference, an accord must be reached. Both groups can teach, grow and learn from the other.

As the retirement ages continue to rise and the evolution of the workplace continues, maybe we will see a transformation and the revocation of any idea of a generational rift. The millennials are a huge and beneficial entity as are the older and more experienced boomers. Hopefully by focusing on the common goal of finding meaning work, the environment will be one of collaborative nurturing, leading and learning.

 

JR RochesterJR Rochester is a recent graduate of East Carolina University with a degree in public relations and interpersonal organizational communication, with a passion for digital communication, interpersonal communication and international relations. He has experience in social media, community building digitally and locally, in-depth experience planning, implementing digital product marketing strategies, grass roots efforts, client and brand reputation management, event planning and marketing. He is a member of PRSA Charlotte, PRSA New Professionals Section and Toastmasters International. He is a proud veteran, drummer, avid cook and self-professed geek.